Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia

Take Action

Say No to Anti-Choice Pharmacies!

Hypocrisy Thy Name is Lt. Governor Bolling

Ask Your Senators To Oppose Three Anti-Choice Bills!

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

1/5/2009
For Privacy’s Sake, Taking Risks to End Pregnancy

» more choice headlines

Kathy's Story

Posted: 01/12/2005

I am 41 years old and have been on the pill for 12 years. Before that, I had been on the pill for two years (1987-1989) and other than those times, have used a diaphragm or condoms for birth control.

I have always been very conscious of the seriousness of the decision to have a child, and scrupulously careful to prevent this from happening unless I was 100% sure I was ready. It just so happens that I've never felt ready to have a child. Rather than bring another human being into the world when I'm not sure, I prefer to use contraception.

My present health insurance does not cover contraception unless I need it for some reason other than birth control. So, if I want it covered, my doctor and I would have to lie about why I'm using it.

If I wanted a child, I would be actively trying to get pregnant, not actively trying to prevent pregnancy. I probably would have had one by now, most likely while I was married. The fact that I have never seriously tried to get pregnant should be enough to convince people that I do not want children. Why is my wish not taken seriously?

I think that at 41 years old, when I'm self-supporting and paying taxes, I have the right to determine my own health care and my own family planning.

And I think that if insurance can cover Viagra and fertility treatments, then it should also cover contraception. What's the difference?

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia

©NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia